GHSA-W88F-4875-99C8
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-11-26 09:31 – Updated: 2025-11-26 23:19Apache Druid’s Kerberos authenticator uses a weak fallback secret when the druid.auth.authenticator.kerberos.cookieSignatureSecret configuration is not explicitly set. In this case, the secret is generated using ThreadLocalRandom, which is not a crypto-graphically secure random number generator. This may allow an attacker to predict or brute force the secret used to sign authentication cookies, potentially enabling token forgery or authentication bypass. Additionally, each process generates its own fallback secret, resulting in inconsistent secrets across nodes. This causes authentication failures in distributed or multi-broker deployments, effectively leading to a incorrectly configured clusters. Users are advised to configure a strong druid.auth.authenticator.kerberos.cookieSignatureSecret
This issue affects Apache Druid: through 34.0.0.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 35.0.0, which fixes the issue making it mandatory to set druid.auth.authenticator.kerberos.cookieSignatureSecret when using the Kerberos authenticator. Services will fail to come up if the secret is not set.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.apache.druid:druid"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "35.0.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-59390"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-338"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2025-11-26T23:19:18Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2025-11-26T09:15:46Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "Apache Druid\u2019s Kerberos authenticator uses a weak fallback secret when the `druid.auth.authenticator.kerberos.cookieSignatureSecret` configuration is not explicitly set. In this case, the secret is generated using `ThreadLocalRandom`, which is not a crypto-graphically secure random number generator. This may allow an attacker to predict or brute force the secret used to sign authentication cookies, potentially enabling token forgery or authentication bypass. Additionally, each process generates its own fallback secret, resulting in inconsistent secrets across nodes. This causes authentication failures in distributed or multi-broker deployments, effectively leading to a incorrectly configured clusters. Users are advised to configure a strong\u00a0`druid.auth.authenticator.kerberos.cookieSignatureSecret`\n\nThis issue affects Apache Druid: through 34.0.0.\n\nUsers are recommended to upgrade to version 35.0.0, which fixes the issue making it mandatory to set `druid.auth.authenticator.kerberos.cookieSignatureSecret` when using the\u00a0Kerberos authenticator. Services will fail to come up if the secret is not set.",
"id": "GHSA-w88f-4875-99c8",
"modified": "2025-11-26T23:19:18Z",
"published": "2025-11-26T09:31:21Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-59390"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/apache/druid/pull/18368"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/apache/druid"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/jwjltllnntgj1sb9wzsjmvwm9f8rlhg8"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/11/26/1"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Apache Druid\u2019s Kerberos authenticator uses a weak fallback secret"
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.