GHSA-W979-WCRR-7WHW

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-04-29 02:57 – Updated: 2022-04-29 02:57
VLAI?
Details

Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in the get_header function in header.c for LHA 1.14, as used in products such as Barracuda Spam Firewall, allow remote attackers or local users to execute arbitrary code via long directory or file names in an LHA archive, which triggers the overflow when testing or extracting the archive.

Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2004-0234"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-119"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2004-08-18T04:00:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in the get_header function in header.c for LHA 1.14, as used in products such as Barracuda Spam Firewall, allow remote attackers or local users to execute arbitrary code via long directory or file names in an LHA archive, which triggers the overflow when testing or extracting the archive.",
  "id": "GHSA-w979-wcrr-7whw",
  "modified": "2022-04-29T02:57:23Z",
  "published": "2022-04-29T02:57:23Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2004-0234"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1833"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/16012"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A977"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A9881"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2006-04/0059.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://distro.conectiva.com.br/atualizacoes/?id=a\u0026anuncio=000840"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2004-May/020776.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2004-May/020778.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=108422737918885\u0026w=2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/19514"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200405-02.xml"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1015866"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2004/dsa-515"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.guay-leroux.com/projects/barracuda-advisory-LHA.txt"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/5753"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/5754"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-announce-list/2004-May/msg00005.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2004-178.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2004-179.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/10243"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/1220"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.