GHSA-W9VX-28M4-G24H
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 03:44 – Updated: 2022-05-14 03:44
VLAI?
Details
The WNM Sleep Mode code in wpa_supplicant 2.x before 2.6 does not properly ignore key data in response frames when management frame protection (MFP) was not negotiated, which allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary broadcast or multicast packets or cause a denial of service (ignored packets) via a WNM Sleep Mode response.
Severity ?
4.3 (Medium)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2015-5310"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-200"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2016-01-06T19:59:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The WNM Sleep Mode code in wpa_supplicant 2.x before 2.6 does not properly ignore key data in response frames when management frame protection (MFP) was not negotiated, which allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary broadcast or multicast packets or cause a denial of service (ignored packets) via a WNM Sleep Mode response.",
"id": "GHSA-w9vx-28m4-g24h",
"modified": "2022-05-14T03:44:08Z",
"published": "2022-05-14T03:44:08Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-5310"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://source.android.com/security/bulletin/2016-01-01.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://w1.fi/security/2015-6/wpa_supplicant-unauthorized-wnm-sleep-mode-gtk-control.txt"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3397"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/11/10/9"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/77541"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1034592"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2808-1"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…