ghsa-wcf7-2f92-j5mv
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:28
Modified
2022-05-13 01:28
Severity ?
Details
cipher/elgamal.c in Libgcrypt through 1.8.2, when used to encrypt messages directly, improperly encodes plaintexts, which allows attackers to obtain sensitive information by reading ciphertext data (i.e., it does not have semantic security in face of a ciphertext-only attack). The Decisional Diffie-Hellman (DDH) assumption does not hold for Libgcrypt's ElGamal implementation.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2018-6829" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-327" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2018-02-07T23:29:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "cipher/elgamal.c in Libgcrypt through 1.8.2, when used to encrypt messages directly, improperly encodes plaintexts, which allows attackers to obtain sensitive information by reading ciphertext data (i.e., it does not have semantic security in face of a ciphertext-only attack). The Decisional Diffie-Hellman (DDH) assumption does not hold for Libgcrypt\u0027s ElGamal implementation.", "id": "GHSA-wcf7-2f92-j5mv", "modified": "2022-05-13T01:28:55Z", "published": "2022-05-13T01:28:55Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-6829" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/weikengchen/attack-on-libgcrypt-elgamal" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/weikengchen/attack-on-libgcrypt-elgamal/wiki" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gcrypt-devel/2018-February/004394.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2020.html" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.