ghsa-wf5p-g6vw-rhxx
Vulnerability from github
Published
2023-11-08 21:30
Modified
2024-06-21 21:33
Summary
Axios Cross-Site Request Forgery Vulnerability
Details

An issue discovered in Axios 0.8.1 through 1.5.1 inadvertently reveals the confidential XSRF-TOKEN stored in cookies by including it in the HTTP header X-XSRF-TOKEN for every request made to any host allowing attackers to view sensitive information.

Show details on source website


{
   affected: [
      {
         package: {
            ecosystem: "npm",
            name: "axios",
         },
         ranges: [
            {
               events: [
                  {
                     introduced: "1.0.0",
                  },
                  {
                     fixed: "1.6.0",
                  },
               ],
               type: "ECOSYSTEM",
            },
         ],
      },
      {
         package: {
            ecosystem: "npm",
            name: "axios",
         },
         ranges: [
            {
               events: [
                  {
                     introduced: "0.8.1",
                  },
                  {
                     fixed: "0.28.0",
                  },
               ],
               type: "ECOSYSTEM",
            },
         ],
      },
   ],
   aliases: [
      "CVE-2023-45857",
   ],
   database_specific: {
      cwe_ids: [
         "CWE-352",
      ],
      github_reviewed: true,
      github_reviewed_at: "2023-11-10T00:35:37Z",
      nvd_published_at: "2023-11-08T21:15:08Z",
      severity: "MODERATE",
   },
   details: "An issue discovered in Axios 0.8.1 through 1.5.1 inadvertently reveals the confidential XSRF-TOKEN stored in cookies by including it in the HTTP header X-XSRF-TOKEN for every request made to any host allowing attackers to view sensitive information.",
   id: "GHSA-wf5p-g6vw-rhxx",
   modified: "2024-06-21T21:33:58Z",
   published: "2023-11-08T21:30:37Z",
   references: [
      {
         type: "ADVISORY",
         url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-45857",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://github.com/axios/axios/issues/6006",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://github.com/axios/axios/issues/6022",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://github.com/axios/axios/pull/6028",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://github.com/axios/axios/pull/6091",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://github.com/axios/axios/commit/2755df562b9c194fba6d8b609a383443f6a6e967",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://github.com/axios/axios/commit/96ee232bd3ee4de2e657333d4d2191cd389e14d0",
      },
      {
         type: "PACKAGE",
         url: "https://github.com/axios/axios",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://github.com/axios/axios/releases/tag/v0.28.0",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://github.com/axios/axios/releases/tag/v1.6.0",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240621-0006",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://security.snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-AXIOS-6032459",
      },
   ],
   schema_version: "1.4.0",
   severity: [
      {
         score: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
         type: "CVSS_V3",
      },
   ],
   summary: "Axios Cross-Site Request Forgery Vulnerability",
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.