GHSA-WFV3-VV9V-VVMQ

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-11-28 00:30 – Updated: 2025-11-28 00:30
VLAI?
Details

An issue was discovered in Logpoint before 7.7.0. Insufficient input validation and a lack of output escaping in multiple components leads to a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-66359"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-79"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-11-28T00:15:46Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "An issue was discovered in Logpoint before 7.7.0. Insufficient input validation and a lack of output escaping in multiple components leads to a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability.",
  "id": "GHSA-wfv3-vv9v-vvmq",
  "modified": "2025-11-28T00:30:26Z",
  "published": "2025-11-28T00:30:26Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-66359"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://servicedesk.logpoint.com/hc/en-us/articles/29158899698333-XSS-Vulnerability-due-to-insufficient-input-validation"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…