ghsa-wg2c-jc4j-gg9c
Vulnerability from github
Published
2021-12-16 00:00
Modified
2022-03-30 00:01
Severity ?
Details
stab_xcoff_builtin_type in stabs.c in GNU Binutils through 2.37 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (heap-based buffer overflow) or possibly have unspecified other impact, as demonstrated by an out-of-bounds write. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incorrect fix for CVE-2018-12699.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2021-45078" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-787" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2021-12-15T20:15:00Z", "severity": "CRITICAL" }, "details": "stab_xcoff_builtin_type in stabs.c in GNU Binutils through 2.37 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (heap-based buffer overflow) or possibly have unspecified other impact, as demonstrated by an out-of-bounds write. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incorrect fix for CVE-2018-12699.", "id": "GHSA-wg2c-jc4j-gg9c", "modified": "2022-03-30T00:01:59Z", "published": "2021-12-16T00:00:30Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-45078" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/UQBH244M5PV6S6UMHUTCVCWFZDX7Y4M6" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/UUHLDDT3HH7YEY6TX7IJRGPJUTNNVEL3" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202208-30" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220107-0002" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28694" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=161e87d12167b1e36193385485c1f6ce92f74f02" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.