ghsa-wgq5-wwrv-g964
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 01:04
Modified
2022-05-14 01:04
Details

IBM Domino 8.5.3, and 9.0 is vulnerable to a stack based overflow in the IMAP service that could allow an authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code by specifying a large mailbox name. IBM X-Force ID: 124749.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2017-1274"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-119"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2017-04-25T18:59:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "IBM Domino 8.5.3, and 9.0 is vulnerable to a stack based overflow in the IMAP service that could allow an authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code by specifying a large mailbox name. IBM X-Force ID: 124749.",
  "id": "GHSA-wgq5-wwrv-g964",
  "modified": "2022-05-14T01:04:20Z",
  "published": "2022-05-14T01:04:20Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-1274"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/676632"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/152786/Lotus-Domino-8.5.3-EXAMINE-Stack-Buffer-Overflow.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg22002280"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/97910"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/98019"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1038358"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.