ghsa-wgq5-wwrv-g964
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 01:04
Modified
2022-05-14 01:04
Severity ?
Details
IBM Domino 8.5.3, and 9.0 is vulnerable to a stack based overflow in the IMAP service that could allow an authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code by specifying a large mailbox name. IBM X-Force ID: 124749.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2017-1274" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-119" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2017-04-25T18:59:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "IBM Domino 8.5.3, and 9.0 is vulnerable to a stack based overflow in the IMAP service that could allow an authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code by specifying a large mailbox name. IBM X-Force ID: 124749.", "id": "GHSA-wgq5-wwrv-g964", "modified": "2022-05-14T01:04:20Z", "published": "2022-05-14T01:04:20Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-1274" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/676632" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/152786/Lotus-Domino-8.5.3-EXAMINE-Stack-Buffer-Overflow.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg22002280" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/97910" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/98019" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1038358" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.