GHSA-WGQ5-WWRV-G964
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 01:04 – Updated: 2022-05-14 01:04
VLAI?
Details
IBM Domino 8.5.3, and 9.0 is vulnerable to a stack based overflow in the IMAP service that could allow an authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code by specifying a large mailbox name. IBM X-Force ID: 124749.
Severity ?
8.8 (High)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2017-1274"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-119"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2017-04-25T18:59:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "IBM Domino 8.5.3, and 9.0 is vulnerable to a stack based overflow in the IMAP service that could allow an authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code by specifying a large mailbox name. IBM X-Force ID: 124749.",
"id": "GHSA-wgq5-wwrv-g964",
"modified": "2022-05-14T01:04:20Z",
"published": "2022-05-14T01:04:20Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-1274"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/676632"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/152786/Lotus-Domino-8.5.3-EXAMINE-Stack-Buffer-Overflow.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg22002280"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/97910"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/98019"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1038358"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…