GHSA-WHQG-PPGF-WP8C
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-12-08 16:26 – Updated: 2025-12-09 16:28
VLAI?
Summary
Astro has an Authentication Bypass via Double URL Encoding, a bypass for CVE-2025-64765
Details
Authentication Bypass via Double URL Encoding in Astro
Bypass for CVE-2025-64765 / GHSA-ggxq-hp9w-j794
Summary
A double URL encoding bypass allows any unauthenticated attacker to bypass path-based authentication checks in Astro middleware, granting unauthorized access to protected routes. While the original CVE-2025-64765 (single URL encoding) was fixed in v5.15.8, the fix is insufficient as it only decodes once. By using double-encoded URLs like /%2561dmin instead of /%61dmin, attackers can still bypass authentication and access protected resources such as /admin, /api/internal, or any route protected by middleware pathname checks.
Fix
A more secure fix is just decoding once, then if the request has a %xx format, return a 400 error by using something like :
if (containsEncodedCharacters(pathname)) {
// Multi-level encoding detected - reject request
return new Response(
'Bad Request: Multi-level URL encoding is not allowed',
{
status: 400,
headers: { 'Content-Type': 'text/plain' }
}
);
}
Severity ?
6.5 (Medium)
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "astro"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "5.15.8"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-66202"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-647"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2025-12-08T16:26:43Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2025-12-09T00:15:48Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "# Authentication Bypass via Double URL Encoding in Astro\n## Bypass for CVE-2025-64765 / GHSA-ggxq-hp9w-j794\n\n---\n\n### Summary\n\nA **double URL encoding bypass** allows any unauthenticated attacker to bypass path-based authentication checks in Astro middleware, granting unauthorized access to protected routes. While the original CVE-2025-64765 (single URL encoding) was fixed in v5.15.8, the fix is insufficient as it only decodes once. By using double-encoded URLs like `/%2561dmin` instead of `/%61dmin`, attackers can still bypass authentication and access protected resources such as `/admin`, `/api/internal`, or any route protected by middleware pathname checks.\n\n\n## Fix \n\nA more secure fix is just decoding once, then if the request has a %xx format, return a 400 error by using something like :\n\n```\nif (containsEncodedCharacters(pathname)) {\n // Multi-level encoding detected - reject request\n return new Response(\n \u0027Bad Request: Multi-level URL encoding is not allowed\u0027,\n {\n status: 400,\n headers: { \u0027Content-Type\u0027: \u0027text/plain\u0027 }\n }\n );\n }\n```",
"id": "GHSA-whqg-ppgf-wp8c",
"modified": "2025-12-09T16:28:41Z",
"published": "2025-12-08T16:26:43Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/withastro/astro/security/advisories/GHSA-ggxq-hp9w-j794"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/withastro/astro/security/advisories/GHSA-whqg-ppgf-wp8c"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-64765"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-66202"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/withastro/astro/commit/6f800813516b07bbe12c666a92937525fddb58ce"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/withastro/astro"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Astro has an Authentication Bypass via Double URL Encoding, a bypass for CVE-2025-64765"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…