ghsa-wm8r-9c6v-49f4
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 02:38
Modified
2022-05-17 02:38
Details

Stack-based buffer overflow in the ihex_scan function in bfd/ihex.c in GNU binutils 2.24 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly have other unspecified impact via a crafted ihex file.

Show details on source website


{
   affected: [],
   aliases: [
      "CVE-2014-8503",
   ],
   database_specific: {
      cwe_ids: [
         "CWE-119",
      ],
      github_reviewed: false,
      github_reviewed_at: null,
      nvd_published_at: "2014-12-09T23:59:00Z",
      severity: "HIGH",
   },
   details: "Stack-based buffer overflow in the ihex_scan function in bfd/ihex.c in GNU binutils 2.24 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly have other unspecified impact via a crafted ihex file.",
   id: "GHSA-wm8r-9c6v-49f4",
   modified: "2022-05-17T02:38:59Z",
   published: "2022-05-17T02:38:59Z",
   references: [
      {
         type: "ADVISORY",
         url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-8503",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162607",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201612-24",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17512",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;h=0102ea8cec5fc509bba6c91df61b7ce23a799d32",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2014-December/145262.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2014-December/145328.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2014-December/145742.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-January/147346.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-January/147354.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-January/148427.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/62241",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/62746",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2015:029",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/10/31/1",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinoct2015-2719645.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/70868",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2496-1",
      },
   ],
   schema_version: "1.4.0",
   severity: [],
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.