ghsa-wpc6-vfm5-8g65
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 07:35
Modified
2022-05-01 07:35
Details
Coppermine Photo Gallery (CPG) 1.4.8 stable, with register_globals enabled, allows remote attackers to bypass XSS protection and set arbitrary variables via a query string that causes the variable to be defined in global space, with separate _GET, _REQUEST, or other critical parameters, which are unset by the protection scheme and prevent the original variable from being detected.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2006-6123" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2006-11-26T23:07:00Z", "severity": "LOW" }, "details": "Coppermine Photo Gallery (CPG) 1.4.8 stable, with register_globals enabled, allows remote attackers to bypass XSS protection and set arbitrary variables via a query string that causes the variable to be defined in global space, with separate _GET, _REQUEST, or other critical parameters, which are unset by the protection scheme and prevent the original variable from being detected.", "id": "GHSA-wpc6-vfm5-8g65", "modified": "2022-05-01T07:35:07Z", "published": "2022-05-01T07:35:07Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2006-6123" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/27376" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2006-06/0482.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://myimei.com/security/2006-06-20/coppermine-148parameter-cleanup-system-bypassregistering-global-varables.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/20597" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://securityreason.com/securityalert/1914" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/coppermine?view=rev\u0026revision=3133" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/27618" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.