GHSA-WPFF-WM84-X5CX

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-04-04 14:39 – Updated: 2025-06-30 17:54
VLAI?
Summary
Mobile Security Framework (MobSF) vulnerable to SSRF in firebase database check
Details

Impact

What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted? SSRF vulnerability in firebase database check logic. The attacker can cause the server to make a connection to internal-only services within the organization’s infrastructure. When malicious app is uploaded to Static analyzer, it is possible to make internal requests.

Credits: Oleg Surnin (Positive Technologies).

Patches

Has the problem been patched? What versions should users upgrade to? v3.9.8 and above

Workarounds

Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading? Code level patch

References

Are there any links users can visit to find out more? https://github.com/MobSF/Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF/pull/2373

Severity ?
6.3 (Medium)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 3.9.7"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "mobsf"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "3.9.8"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-31215"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-918"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2024-04-04T14:39:03Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-04-04T16:15:09Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Impact\n_What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted?_\nSSRF vulnerability in firebase database check logic. The attacker can cause the server to make a connection to internal-only services within the organization\u2019s infrastructure. When malicious app is uploaded to Static analyzer, it is possible to make internal requests.\n\nCredits:  Oleg Surnin (Positive Technologies).\n\n### Patches\n_Has the problem been patched? What versions should users upgrade to?_\nv3.9.8 and above\n\n### Workarounds\n_Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?_\nCode level patch\n\n### References\n_Are there any links users can visit to find out more?_\nhttps://github.com/MobSF/Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF/pull/2373",
  "id": "GHSA-wpff-wm84-x5cx",
  "modified": "2025-06-30T17:54:56Z",
  "published": "2024-04-04T14:39:03Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/MobSF/Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF/security/advisories/GHSA-wpff-wm84-x5cx"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-31215"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/MobSF/Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF/pull/2373"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/MobSF/Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF/commit/43bb71d115d78c03faa82d75445dd908e9b32716"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/MobSF/Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Mobile Security Framework (MobSF) vulnerable to SSRF in firebase database check"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.