ghsa-wph7-m6hx-9r8m
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 05:19
Modified
2022-05-17 05:19
Details
crypto/bn/bn_nist.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8h on 32-bit platforms, as used in stunnel and other products, in certain circumstances involving ECDH or ECDHE cipher suites, uses an incorrect modular reduction algorithm in its implementation of the P-256 and P-384 NIST elliptic curves, which allows remote attackers to obtain the private key of a TLS server via multiple handshake attempts.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2011-4354" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2012-01-27T00:55:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "crypto/bn/bn_nist.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8h on 32-bit platforms, as used in stunnel and other products, in certain circumstances involving ECDH or ECDHE cipher suites, uses an incorrect modular reduction algorithm in its implementation of the P-256 and P-384 NIST elliptic curves, which allows remote attackers to obtain the private key of a TLS server via multiple handshake attempts.", "id": "GHSA-wph7-m6hx-9r8m", "modified": "2022-05-17T05:19:14Z", "published": "2022-05-17T05:19:14Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-4354" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=757909" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://crypto.di.uminho.pt/CACE/CT-RSA2012-openssl-src.zip" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://cvs.openssl.org/filediff?f=openssl/crypto/bn/bn_nist.c\u0026v1=1.14\u0026v2=1.21" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://eprint.iacr.org/2011/633" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://marc.info/?t=119271238800004" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/12/01/6" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=1593\u0026user=guest\u0026pass=guest" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2012/dsa-2390" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.