ghsa-wpvc-4p68-c62q
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 02:06
Modified
2022-05-01 02:06
Details

Unknown vulnerability in F5 BIG-IP 9.0.2 through 9.1 allows attackers to "subvert the authentication of SSL transactions," via unknown attack vectors, possibly involving NATIVE ciphers.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2005-2245"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2005-07-12T04:00:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Unknown vulnerability in F5 BIG-IP 9.0.2 through 9.1 allows attackers to \"subvert the authentication of SSL transactions,\" via unknown attack vectors, possibly involving NATIVE ciphers.",
  "id": "GHSA-wpvc-4p68-c62q",
  "modified": "2022-05-01T02:06:10Z",
  "published": "2022-05-01T02:06:10Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2005-2245"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/16008"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1014452"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://tech.f5.com/home/bigip-next/solutions/security/sol4944.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/14215"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.