GHSA-WQ52-9GH8-CWRP
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 05:27 – Updated: 2022-05-17 05:27
VLAI?
Details
The ssh_gssapi_parse_ename function in gss-serv.c in OpenSSH 5.8 and earlier, when gssapi-with-mic authentication is enabled, allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via a large value in a certain length field. NOTE: there may be limited scenarios in which this issue is relevant.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2011-5000"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2012-04-05T14:55:00Z",
"severity": "LOW"
},
"details": "The ssh_gssapi_parse_ename function in gss-serv.c in OpenSSH 5.8 and earlier, when gssapi-with-mic authentication is enabled, allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via a large value in a certain length field. NOTE: there may be limited scenarios in which this issue is relevant.",
"id": "GHSA-wq52-9gh8-cwrp",
"modified": "2022-05-17T05:27:39Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T05:27:39Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-5000"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0884.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2011/Aug/2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://site.pi3.com.pl/adv/ssh_1.txt"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…