ghsa-wq52-mm9r-c9xx
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-02 06:16
Modified
2022-05-02 06:16
Details
Stack-based buffer overflow in VBScript in Microsoft Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP2 and SP3, and Server 2003 SP2, when Internet Explorer is used, might allow user-assisted remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long string in the fourth argument (aka helpfile argument) to the MsgBox function, leading to code execution when the F1 key is pressed, a different vulnerability than CVE-2010-0483.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2010-0917" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-119" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2010-03-03T19:30:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Stack-based buffer overflow in VBScript in Microsoft Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP2 and SP3, and Server 2003 SP2, when Internet Explorer is used, might allow user-assisted remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long string in the fourth argument (aka helpfile argument) to the MsgBox function, leading to code execution when the F1 key is pressed, a different vulnerability than CVE-2010-0483.", "id": "GHSA-wq52-mm9r-c9xx", "modified": "2022-05-02T06:16:57Z", "published": "2022-05-02T06:16:57Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2010-0917" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/56560" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://blogs.technet.com/msrc/archive/2010/03/01/security-advisory-981169-released.aspx" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://isec.pl/vulnerabilities/isec-0027-msgbox-helpfile-ie.txt" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://isec.pl/vulnerabilities10.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/advisory/981169.mspx" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/38473" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/03/01/ie_code_execution_bug" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.