ghsa-wr66-cqr2-pw8r
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 02:15
Modified
2022-05-17 02:15
Severity ?
Details

Stack-based buffer overflow in dnstracer through 1.9 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a command line with a long name argument that is mishandled in a strcpy call for argv[0]. An example threat model is a web application that launches dnstracer with an untrusted name string.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2017-9430"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-119"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2017-06-05T11:29:00Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "Stack-based buffer overflow in dnstracer through 1.9 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a command line with a long name argument that is mishandled in a strcpy call for argv[0]. An example threat model is a web application that launches dnstracer with an untrusted name string.",
  "id": "GHSA-wr66-cqr2-pw8r",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T02:15:29Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T02:15:29Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-9430"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://cxsecurity.com/issue/WLB-2017060030"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://packetstormsecurity.com/files/142799/DNSTracer-1.8.1-Buffer-Overflow.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/42115"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/42424"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.