GHSA-WR69-PFWC-72WX
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-10 15:33 – Updated: 2026-08-14 00:31In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
tcp: challenge ACK for non-exact RST in SYN-RECEIVED
The SYN-RECEIVED request-socket path in tcp_check_req() accepts an in-window RST without requiring SEG.SEQ to exactly match RCV.NXT. A non-exact RST therefore removes the request instead of eliciting a challenge ACK.
RFC 9293 section 3.10.7.4 applies the RFC 5961 reset check in SYN-RECEIVED: an exact RST resets the connection, while a non-exact in-window RST must trigger a challenge ACK and be dropped.
Apply that check before the ACK-field validation, following the RFC sequence-number, RST, then ACK processing order. Factor the per-netns challenge ACK quota out of tcp_send_challenge_ack() so request sockets can share it. Use the request socket's send_ack() callback and its own out-of-window ACK timestamp to send and rate-limit the response.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-68118"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-08-10T13:19:56Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ntcp: challenge ACK for non-exact RST in SYN-RECEIVED\n\nThe SYN-RECEIVED request-socket path in tcp_check_req() accepts an\nin-window RST without requiring SEG.SEQ to exactly match RCV.NXT. A\nnon-exact RST therefore removes the request instead of eliciting a\nchallenge ACK.\n\nRFC 9293 section 3.10.7.4 applies the RFC 5961 reset check in\nSYN-RECEIVED: an exact RST resets the connection, while a non-exact\nin-window RST must trigger a challenge ACK and be dropped.\n\nApply that check before the ACK-field validation, following the RFC\nsequence-number, RST, then ACK processing order. Factor the per-netns\nchallenge ACK quota out of tcp_send_challenge_ack() so request sockets\ncan share it. Use the request socket\u0027s send_ack() callback and its own\nout-of-window ACK timestamp to send and rate-limit the response.",
"id": "GHSA-wr69-pfwc-72wx",
"modified": "2026-08-14T00:31:51Z",
"published": "2026-08-10T15:33:36Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-68118"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/22cec809b048495310f206d9abbcdbbfbdce3ae3"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/234f9ffbd9b2c1b24ec67200ea3cff07401bec48"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a28c4fcbf774e23b4779cae468e3497a5ad1f4a1"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.