ghsa-wrhh-wfqw-8957
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:44
Modified
2022-05-13 01:44
Severity ?
Details
In Exiv2 0.26, there is a heap-based buffer over-read in the Exiv2::IptcData::printStructure function in iptc.cpp, related to the "!= 0x1c" case. Remote attackers can exploit this vulnerability to cause a denial of service via a crafted TIFF file.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2017-17724" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-125" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2018-02-12T22:29:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "In Exiv2 0.26, there is a heap-based buffer over-read in the Exiv2::IptcData::printStructure function in iptc.cpp, related to the \"!= 0x1c\" case. Remote attackers can exploit this vulnerability to cause a denial of service via a crafted TIFF file.", "id": "GHSA-wrhh-wfqw-8957", "modified": "2022-05-13T01:44:27Z", "published": "2022-05-13T01:44:27Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-17724" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/Exiv2/exiv2/issues/263" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2101" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1524107" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/xiaoqx/pocs/blob/master/exiv2/readme.md" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201811-14" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.