GHSA-WRQJ-HMV6-RX3J

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 02:40 – Updated: 2022-05-14 02:40
VLAI?
Details

Opera 9.51 on Windows XP does not properly handle (1) multipart/mixed e-mail messages with many MIME parts and possibly (2) e-mail messages with many "Content-type: message/rfc822;" headers, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (stack consumption or other resource consumption) via a large e-mail message, a related issue to CVE-2006-1173.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2008-5428"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2008-12-11T15:30:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Opera 9.51 on Windows XP does not properly handle (1) multipart/mixed e-mail messages with many MIME parts and possibly (2) e-mail messages with many \"Content-type: message/rfc822;\" headers, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (stack consumption or other resource consumption) via a large e-mail message, a related issue to CVE-2006-1173.",
  "id": "GHSA-wrqj-hmv6-rx3j",
  "modified": "2022-05-14T02:40:13Z",
  "published": "2022-05-14T02:40:13Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-5428"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://mime.recurity.com/cgi-bin/twiki/view/Main/AttackIntro"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://securityreason.com/securityalert/4721"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/499038/100/0/threaded"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/499045/100/0/threaded"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…