GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-WV8R-9HH3-P28X

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-11 21:31 – Updated: 2026-09-13 09:32
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

platform/x86/amd/pmc: Propagate SMU errors and validate S2D address

amd_stb_s2d_init() discards the return value of several S2D SMU commands. When the SMU refuses a command (e.g. "SMU cmd failed. err: 0xff") the failure is only noticed indirectly - if at all - and reported as -EIO, masking the real error.

More seriously, the S2D_PHYS_ADDR_LOW/HIGH return values are ignored, so on failure phys_addr_low/hi are left uninitialised and the assembled address is passed straight to devm_ioremap(). When the SMU leaves them at zero this maps physical address 0 and trips the ioremap-on-RAM warning:

amd_pmc AMDI000B:00: SMU cmd failed. err: 0xff ioremap on RAM at 0x0000000000000000 - 0x0000000000ffffff WARNING: CPU: 13 PID: 4592 at arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c:...

Check the return value of each SMU command and propagate it, and reject a zero physical address before calling devm_ioremap().

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-81016"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-09-11T20:19:10Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nplatform/x86/amd/pmc: Propagate SMU errors and validate S2D address\n\namd_stb_s2d_init() discards the return value of several S2D SMU commands.\nWhen the SMU refuses a command (e.g. \"SMU cmd failed. err: 0xff\") the\nfailure is only noticed indirectly - if at all - and reported as -EIO,\nmasking the real error.\n\nMore seriously, the S2D_PHYS_ADDR_LOW/HIGH return values are ignored, so\non failure phys_addr_low/hi are left uninitialised and the assembled\naddress is passed straight to devm_ioremap().  When the SMU leaves them at\nzero this maps physical address 0 and trips the ioremap-on-RAM warning:\n\n  amd_pmc AMDI000B:00: SMU cmd failed. err: 0xff\n  ioremap on RAM at 0x0000000000000000 - 0x0000000000ffffff\n  WARNING: CPU: 13 PID: 4592 at arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c:...\n\nCheck the return value of each SMU command and propagate it, and reject a\nzero physical address before calling devm_ioremap().",
  "id": "GHSA-wv8r-9hh3-p28x",
  "modified": "2026-09-13T09:32:11Z",
  "published": "2026-09-11T21:31:24Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-81016"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0225c1d637687b03726f00ac65b6def843d2c464"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/775d4cde1f9737796ce7d8393521e9e8c5b49891"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8178f59d76570b152d836bde07f5997f15861f04"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…