GHSA-WVW9-5VQ9-WMCQ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-10-07 18:15 – Updated: 2022-10-10 00:00
VLAI
Details
IBM QRadar SIEM 7.4 and 7.5 data node rebalancing does not function correctly when using encrypted hosts which could result in information disclosure. IBM X-Force ID: 225889.
Severity
7.5 (High)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-22480"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-668"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-10-07T17:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "IBM QRadar SIEM 7.4 and 7.5 data node rebalancing does not function correctly when using encrypted hosts which could result in information disclosure. IBM X-Force ID: 225889.",
"id": "GHSA-wvw9-5vq9-wmcq",
"modified": "2022-10-10T00:00:32Z",
"published": "2022-10-07T18:15:42Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-22480"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/225889"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/6826695"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…