ghsa-ww27-vpf9-hhf2
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 17:52
Modified
2022-05-01 17:52
Details
Sylpheed 2.2.7 and earlier does not properly use the --status-fd argument when invoking GnuPG, which prevents Sylpheed from visually distinguishing between signed and unsigned portions of OpenPGP messages with multiple components, which allows remote attackers to forge the contents of a message without detection.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2007-1267" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2007-03-06T20:19:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "Sylpheed 2.2.7 and earlier does not properly use the --status-fd argument when invoking GnuPG, which prevents Sylpheed from visually distinguishing between signed and unsigned portions of OpenPGP messages with multiple components, which allows remote attackers to forge the contents of a message without detection.", "id": "GHSA-ww27-vpf9-hhf2", "modified": "2022-05-01T17:52:03Z", "published": "2022-05-01T17:52:03Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2007-1267" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2007-March/030514.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/24414" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://securityreason.com/securityalert/2353" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.coresecurity.com/?action=item\u0026id=1687" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/461958/100/0/threaded" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/461958/30/7710/threaded" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/22777" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1017727" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/0835" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.