GHSA-WW27-VPF9-HHF2
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 17:52 – Updated: 2022-05-01 17:52
VLAI?
Details
Sylpheed 2.2.7 and earlier does not properly use the --status-fd argument when invoking GnuPG, which prevents Sylpheed from visually distinguishing between signed and unsigned portions of OpenPGP messages with multiple components, which allows remote attackers to forge the contents of a message without detection.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2007-1267"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2007-03-06T20:19:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Sylpheed 2.2.7 and earlier does not properly use the --status-fd argument when invoking GnuPG, which prevents Sylpheed from visually distinguishing between signed and unsigned portions of OpenPGP messages with multiple components, which allows remote attackers to forge the contents of a message without detection.",
"id": "GHSA-ww27-vpf9-hhf2",
"modified": "2022-05-01T17:52:03Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T17:52:03Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2007-1267"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2007-March/030514.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/24414"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://securityreason.com/securityalert/2353"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.coresecurity.com/?action=item\u0026id=1687"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/461958/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/461958/30/7710/threaded"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/22777"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1017727"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/0835"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…