GHSA-WW2M-6VP7-CP37
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 02:11 – Updated: 2025-04-03 04:16
VLAI?
Details
Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in University of Minnesota gopher client 3.0.9 allow remote malicious servers to execute arbitrary code via (1) a long "+VIEWS:" reply, which is not properly handled in the VIfromLine function, and (2) certain arguments when launching third party programs such as a web browser from a web link, which is not properly handled in the FIOgetargv function.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2005-2772"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2005-09-02T23:03:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in University of Minnesota gopher client 3.0.9 allow remote malicious servers to execute arbitrary code via (1) a long \"+VIEWS:\" reply, which is not properly handled in the VIfromLine function, and (2) certain arguments when launching third party programs such as a web browser from a web link, which is not properly handled in the FIOgetargv function.",
"id": "GHSA-ww2m-6vp7-cp37",
"modified": "2025-04-03T04:16:59Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T02:11:36Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2005-2772"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/22053"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=112559902931614\u0026w=2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/16614"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/17016"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2005/dsa-832"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/619812"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/14693"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…