ghsa-wwm5-654g-jj42
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 03:09
Modified
2022-05-14 03:09
Severity ?
Details
An existing mitigation of timing side-channel attacks is insufficient in some circumstances. This issue is addressed in Network Security Services (NSS) 3.26.1. This vulnerability affects Thunderbird < 45.5, Firefox ESR < 45.5, and Firefox < 50.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2016-9074" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-200" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2018-06-11T21:29:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "An existing mitigation of timing side-channel attacks is insufficient in some circumstances. This issue is addressed in Network Security Services (NSS) 3.26.1. This vulnerability affects Thunderbird \u003c 45.5, Firefox ESR \u003c 45.5, and Firefox \u003c 50.", "id": "GHSA-wwm5-654g-jj42", "modified": "2022-05-14T03:09:03Z", "published": "2022-05-14T03:09:03Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-9074" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1293334" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201701-15" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201701-46" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3730" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2016-89" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2016-90" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2016-93" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/94341" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1037298" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.