GHSA-WWQF-VVJR-RMW4
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 03:08 – Updated: 2022-05-14 03:08
VLAI
Details
On D-Link DIR-620 devices with a certain customized (by ISP) variant of firmware 1.0.3, 1.0.37, 1.3.1, 1.3.3, 1.3.7, 1.4.0, and 2.0.22, OS command injection is possible as a result of incorrect processing of the res_buf parameter to index.cgi.
Severity
7.2 (High)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2018-6211"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-78"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2018-06-20T16:29:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "On D-Link DIR-620 devices with a certain customized (by ISP) variant of firmware 1.0.3, 1.0.37, 1.3.1, 1.3.3, 1.3.7, 1.4.0, and 2.0.22, OS command injection is possible as a result of incorrect processing of the res_buf parameter to index.cgi.",
"id": "GHSA-wwqf-vvjr-rmw4",
"modified": "2022-05-14T03:08:15Z",
"published": "2022-05-14T03:08:15Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-6211"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://securelist.com/backdoors-in-d-links-backyard/85530"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://securityaffairs.co/wordpress/72839/hacking/d-link-dir-620-flaws.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/backdoor-account-found-in-d-link-dir-620-routers"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitynewspaper.com/2018/05/25/d-link-dir-620-routers-critical-vulnerabilities"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…