ghsa-wx48-g6pf-jvc9
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 23:57
Modified
2022-05-01 23:57
Details
The Drupal filter_xss_admin function in 5.x before 5.8 and 6.x before 6.3 does not "prevent use of the object HTML tag in administrator input," which has unknown impact and attack vectors, probably related to an insufficient cross-site scripting (XSS) protection mechanism.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2008-3219" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-79" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2008-07-18T16:41:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "The Drupal filter_xss_admin function in 5.x before 5.8 and 6.x before 6.3 does not \"prevent use of the object HTML tag in administrator input,\" which has unknown impact and attack vectors, probably related to an insufficient cross-site scripting (XSS) protection mechanism.", "id": "GHSA-wx48-g6pf-jvc9", "modified": "2022-05-01T23:57:56Z", "published": "2022-05-01T23:57:56Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-3219" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454849" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/43701" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2008-August/msg00016.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2008-July/msg00527.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2008-July/msg00551.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://drupal.org/node/280571" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/31079" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2008/07/10/3" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/30168" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.