GHSA-WX86-C74J-R585
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 02:53 – Updated: 2022-05-14 02:53
VLAI
Details
Buffer overflow in the INetViewX ActiveX control in the Lorex Edge LH310 and Edge+ LH320 series with firmware 7-35-28-1B26E, Edge2 LH330 series with firmware 11.17.38-33_1D97A, and Edge3 LH340 series with firmware 11.19.85_1FE3A allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a long string in the HTTP_PORT parameter.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2014-1201"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-119"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2014-01-15T16:08:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Buffer overflow in the INetViewX ActiveX control in the Lorex Edge LH310 and Edge+ LH320 series with firmware 7-35-28-1B26E, Edge2 LH330 series with firmware 11.17.38-33_1D97A, and Edge3 LH340 series with firmware 11.19.85_1FE3A allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a long string in the HTTP_PORT parameter.",
"id": "GHSA-wx86-c74j-r585",
"modified": "2022-05-14T02:53:38Z",
"published": "2022-05-14T02:53:38Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-1201"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/90223"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/pedrib/PoC/blob/master/lorexActivex/lorex-report.txt"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/pedrib/PoC/blob/master/lorexActivex/lorex-testcase.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://osvdb.org/101903"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/530739/100/0/threaded"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…