GHSA-WX8Q-RGFR-CF6V

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2021-11-10 18:20 – Updated: 2021-12-10 18:30
VLAI?
Summary
Insufficient Granularity of Access Control in github.com/google/exposure-notifications-verification-server
Details

Impact

Users or API keys with permission to expire verification codes could have expired codes that belonged to another realm if they guessed the UUID.

Patches

v1.1.2+

Workarounds

There are no workarounds, and there are no indications this has been exploited in the wild. Verification codes can only be expired by providing their 64-bit UUID, and verification codes are already valid for a very short period of time (thus the UUID rotates frequently).

For more information

Contact exposure-notifications-feedback@google.com

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "github.com/google/exposure-notifications-verification-server"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.1.2"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2021-22565"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-284"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2021-11-09T21:03:07Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2021-12-09T13:15:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Impact\nUsers or API keys with permission to expire verification codes could have expired codes that belonged to another realm if they guessed the UUID.\n\n### Patches\nv1.1.2+\n\n### Workarounds\nThere are no workarounds, and there are no indications this has been exploited in the wild. Verification codes can only be expired by providing their 64-bit UUID, and verification codes are already valid for a very short period of time (thus the UUID rotates frequently).\n\n### For more information\nContact exposure-notifications-feedback@google.com",
  "id": "GHSA-wx8q-rgfr-cf6v",
  "modified": "2021-12-10T18:30:24Z",
  "published": "2021-11-10T18:20:11Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/google/exposure-notifications-verification-server/security/advisories/GHSA-wx8q-rgfr-cf6v"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-22565"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/google/exposure-notifications-verification-server"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/google/exposure-notifications-verification-server/releases/tag/v1.1.2"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Insufficient Granularity of Access Control in github.com/google/exposure-notifications-verification-server"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…