GHSA-WXMH-65F7-JCVW

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-04-19 18:25 – Updated: 2023-04-19 18:25
VLAI?
Summary
Improper header name validation in guzzlehttp/psr7
Details

Impact

Improper header parsing. An attacker could sneak in a newline (\n) into both the header names and values. While the specification states that \r\n\r\n is used to terminate the header list, many servers in the wild will also accept \n\n.

Patches

The issue is patched in 1.9.1 and 2.4.5.

Workarounds

There are no known workarounds.

References

  • https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7230#section-3.2.4
Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Packagist",
        "name": "guzzlehttp/psr7"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.9.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Packagist",
        "name": "guzzlehttp/psr7"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "2.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.4.5"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-29197"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-436"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2023-04-19T18:25:53Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2023-04-17T22:15:09Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Impact\n\nImproper header parsing. An attacker could sneak in a newline (`\\n`) into both the header names and values. While the specification states that `\\r\\n\\r\\n` is used to terminate the header list, many servers in the wild will also accept `\\n\\n`.\n\n### Patches\n\nThe issue is patched in 1.9.1 and 2.4.5.\n\n### Workarounds\n\nThere are no known workarounds.\n\n### References\n\n* https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7230#section-3.2.4\n",
  "id": "GHSA-wxmh-65f7-jcvw",
  "modified": "2023-04-19T18:25:53Z",
  "published": "2023-04-19T18:25:53Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/guzzle/psr7/security/advisories/GHSA-q7rv-6hp3-vh96"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/guzzle/psr7/security/advisories/GHSA-wxmh-65f7-jcvw"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-29197"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2022-24775"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/FriendsOfPHP/security-advisories/blob/master/guzzlehttp/psr7/CVE-2023-29197.yaml"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/guzzle/psr7"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/12/msg00028.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/FJANWDXJZE5BGLN4MQ4FEHV5LJ6CMKQF"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/O35UN4IK6VS2LXSRWUDFWY7NI73RKY2U"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7230#section-3.2.4"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Improper header name validation in guzzlehttp/psr7"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…