ghsa-x2qp-w4jg-wv76
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-08-16 00:00
Modified
2022-08-17 00:00
Severity ?
Details
Apache OpenOffice supports the storage of passwords for web connections in the user's configuration database. The stored passwords are encrypted with a single master key provided by the user. A flaw in OpenOffice existed where the required initialization vector for encryption was always the same which weakens the security of the encryption making them vulnerable if an attacker has access to the user's configuration data. This issue affects: Apache OpenOffice versions prior to 4.1.13. Reference: CVE-2022-26306 - LibreOffice
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2022-37400" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-326", "CWE-330" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2022-08-15T11:21:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Apache OpenOffice supports the storage of passwords for web connections in the user\u0027s configuration database. The stored passwords are encrypted with a single master key provided by the user. A flaw in OpenOffice existed where the required initialization vector for encryption was always the same which weakens the security of the encryption making them vulnerable if an attacker has access to the user\u0027s configuration data. This issue affects: Apache OpenOffice versions prior to 4.1.13. Reference: CVE-2022-26306 - LibreOffice", "id": "GHSA-x2qp-w4jg-wv76", "modified": "2022-08-17T00:00:23Z", "published": "2022-08-16T00:00:31Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-37400" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.openoffice.org/security/cves/CVE-2022-37400.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/08/13/1" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.