ghsa-x3cj-3539-rcpx
Vulnerability from github
Published
2021-07-13 21:07
Modified
2021-12-03 21:04
Severity ?
Summary
Out-of-Bounds Read in Node.js
Details
Node.js before 16.4.1, 14.17.2, 12.22.2 is vulnerable to an out-of-bounds read when uv__idna_toascii() is used to convert strings to ASCII. The pointer p is read and increased without checking whether it is beyond pe, with the latter holding a pointer to the end of the buffer. This can lead to information disclosures or crashes. This function can be triggered via uv_getaddrinfo().
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2021-22918", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-125", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2021-07-12T11:15:00Z", severity: "HIGH", }, details: "Node.js before 16.4.1, 14.17.2, 12.22.2 is vulnerable to an out-of-bounds read when uv__idna_toascii() is used to convert strings to ASCII. The pointer p is read and increased without checking whether it is beyond pe, with the latter holding a pointer to the end of the buffer. This can lead to information disclosures or crashes. This function can be triggered via uv_getaddrinfo().", id: "GHSA-x3cj-3539-rcpx", modified: "2021-12-03T21:04:05Z", published: "2021-07-13T21:07:10Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-22918", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://hackerone.com/reports/1209681", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-389290.pdf", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://nodejs.org/en/blog/vulnerability/july-2021-security-releases", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202401-23", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20210805-0003", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:H", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], summary: "Out-of-Bounds Read in Node.js", }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.