ghsa-x558-4jvq-g5jc
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 01:51
Modified
2022-05-14 01:51
Details

Buffer overflow in the C_SAPGPARAM function in the NetWeaver Dispatcher in SAP KERNEL 7.00 (7000.52.12.34966) and 7.40 (7400.12.21.30308) allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service or possibly execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors, aka SAP Security Note 2063369.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2015-2815"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-119"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2015-04-01T14:59:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Buffer overflow in the C_SAPGPARAM function in the NetWeaver Dispatcher in SAP KERNEL 7.00 (7000.52.12.34966) and 7.40 (7400.12.21.30308) allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service or possibly execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors, aka SAP Security Note 2063369.",
  "id": "GHSA-x558-4jvq-g5jc",
  "modified": "2022-05-14T01:51:13Z",
  "published": "2022-05-14T01:51:13Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-2815"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://erpscan.io/advisories/erpscan-15-003-sapkernel-c_sapgparam-rce-dos"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/132353/SAP-NetWeaver-Dispatcher-Buffer-Overflow.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2015/Jun/61"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/535825/100/800/threaded"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/73897"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.