GHSA-X626-Q4V7-7XC6

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 04:38 – Updated: 2025-04-14 15:44
VLAI?
Summary
Neo4J vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery
Details

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Neo4J 1.9.2 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that execute arbitrary code, as demonstrated by a request to (1) db/data/ext/GremlinPlugin/graphdb/execute_script or (2) db/manage/server/console/.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Maven",
        "name": "org.neo4j:neo4j"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.2.0-M01"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2013-7259"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352",
      "CWE-78"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2025-04-14T15:44:43Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2014-04-29T14:38:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Neo4J 1.9.2 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that execute arbitrary code, as demonstrated by a request to (1) db/data/ext/GremlinPlugin/graphdb/execute_script or (2) db/manage/server/console/.",
  "id": "GHSA-x626-q4v7-7xc6",
  "modified": "2025-04-14T15:44:43Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T04:38:50Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2013-7259"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/neo4j/neo4j/issues/2826"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/neo4j/neo4j/commit/40ad76078a25666d8b218772b6491fb443020df9"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/neo4j/neo4j"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/o2platform/DefCon_RESTing/tree/master/Live-Demos/Neo4j"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://web.archive.org/web/20131017043717/http://blog.diniscruz.com/2013/08/neo4j-csrf-payload-to-start-processes.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/01/03/3"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/01/03/8"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Neo4J vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…