GHSA-X65H-Q64W-PJCG
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-06-16 00:30 – Updated: 2024-11-13 00:30
VLAI?
Details
Mismatches in interpreting USB authorization policy between GNOME Settings Daemon (GSD) through 46.0 and the Linux kernel's underlying device matching logic allow a physically proximate attacker to access some unintended Linux kernel USB functionality, such as USB device-specific kernel modules and filesystem implementations. NOTE: the GSD supplier indicates that consideration of a mitigation for this within GSD would be in the context of "a new feature, not a CVE."
Severity ?
4.3 (Medium)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-38394"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-06-16T00:15:49Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Mismatches in interpreting USB authorization policy between GNOME Settings Daemon (GSD) through 46.0 and the Linux kernel\u0027s underlying device matching logic allow a physically proximate attacker to access some unintended Linux kernel USB functionality, such as USB device-specific kernel modules and filesystem implementations. NOTE: the GSD supplier indicates that consideration of a mitigation for this within GSD would be in the context of \"a new feature, not a CVE.\"",
"id": "GHSA-x65h-q64w-pjcg",
"modified": "2024-11-13T00:30:47Z",
"published": "2024-06-16T00:30:40Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38394"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-settings-daemon/-/issues/780"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-settings-daemon/-/issues/780#note_2047914"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-settings-daemon/-/tags"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://pulsesecurity.co.nz/advisories/usbguard-bypass"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…