GHSA-X676-WGV5-XJJQ

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-04-29 02:59 – Updated: 2022-04-29 02:59
VLAI?
Details

Cisco Secure Access Control Server (ACS) 3.2(3) and earlier, when configured with an anonymous bind in Novell Directory Services (NDS) and authenticating NDS users with NDS, allows remote attackers to gain unauthorized access to AAA clients via a blank password.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2004-1460"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2004-12-31T05:00:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Cisco Secure Access Control Server (ACS) 3.2(3) and earlier, when configured with an anonymous bind in Novell Directory Services (NDS) and authenticating NDS users with NDS, allows remote attackers to gain unauthorized access to AAA clients via a blank password.",
  "id": "GHSA-x676-wgv5-xjjq",
  "modified": "2022-04-29T02:59:37Z",
  "published": "2022-04-29T02:59:37Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2004-1460"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/17117"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20040825-acs.shtml"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/11047"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…