ghsa-x6mq-qm3w-f3w3
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-04 00:29
Modified
2022-05-04 00:29
Details
Buffer overflow in the ospf_ls_upd_list_lsa function in ospf_packet.c in the OSPFv2 implementation in ospfd in Quagga before 0.99.20.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (assertion failure and daemon exit) via a Link State Update (aka LS Update) packet that is smaller than the length specified in its header.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2012-0249" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-119" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2012-04-05T13:25:00Z", "severity": "LOW" }, "details": "Buffer overflow in the ospf_ls_upd_list_lsa function in ospf_packet.c in the OSPFv2 implementation in ospfd in Quagga before 0.99.20.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (assertion failure and daemon exit) via a Link State Update (aka LS Update) packet that is smaller than the length specified in its header.", "id": "GHSA-x6mq-qm3w-f3w3", "modified": "2022-05-04T00:29:01Z", "published": "2022-05-04T00:29:01Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-0249" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.quagga.net/show_bug.cgi?id=705" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2012-April/078794.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2012-April/078910.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2012-April/078926.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1258.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1259.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/48949" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2012/dsa-2459" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/551715" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.