ghsa-x6rf-4v3v-mfmw
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-11-08 06:30
Modified
2024-11-08 06:30
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
remoteproc: k3-r5: Fix error handling when power-up failed
By simply bailing out, the driver was violating its rule and internal assumptions that either both or no rproc should be initialized. E.g., this could cause the first core to be available but not the second one, leading to crashes on its shutdown later on while trying to dereference that second instance.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2024-50176" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2024-11-08T06:15:15Z", "severity": null }, "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nremoteproc: k3-r5: Fix error handling when power-up failed\n\nBy simply bailing out, the driver was violating its rule and internal\nassumptions that either both or no rproc should be initialized. E.g.,\nthis could cause the first core to be available but not the second one,\nleading to crashes on its shutdown later on while trying to dereference\nthat second instance.", "id": "GHSA-x6rf-4v3v-mfmw", "modified": "2024-11-08T06:30:48Z", "published": "2024-11-08T06:30:48Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50176" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7afb5e3aa989c479979faeb18768a67889a7a9c6" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/87ab3af7447791d0c619610fd560bd804549e187" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9ab27eb5866ccbf57715cfdba4b03d57776092fb" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/afd102bde99d90ef41e043c846ea34b04433eb7b" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fc71c23958931713b5e76f317b76be37189f2516" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.