ghsa-x7p5-c683-6jrp
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-04-16 21:31
Modified
2024-05-16 18:30
Details

An Improper Handling of Exceptional Conditions vulnerability in Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows an adjacent unauthenticated attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS), which causes the l2cpd process to crash by sending a specific TLV.

The l2cpd process is responsible for layer 2 control protocols, such as STP, RSTP, MSTP, VSTP, ERP, and LLDP.  The impact of the l2cpd crash is reinitialization of STP protocols (RSTP, MSTP or VSTP), and MVRP and ERP, leading to a Denial of Service.  Continued receipt and processing of this specific TLV will create a sustained Denial of Service (DoS) condition. This issue affects:

Junos OS: all versions before 20.4R3-S9, from 21.2 before 21.2R3-S7, from 21.3 before 21.3R3-S5, from 21.4 before 21.4R3-S4, from 22.1 before 22.1R3-S4, from 22.2 before 22.2R3-S2, from 22.3 before 22.3R2-S2, 22.3R3-S1, from 22.4 before 22.4R2-S2, 22.4R3, from 23.2 before 23.2R1-S1, 23.2R2;

Junos OS Evolved: all versions before 21.2R3-S7,

from 21.3 before 21.3R3-S5-EVO, from 21.4 before 21.4R3-S5-EVO, from 22.1 before 22.1R3-S4-EVO, from 22.2 before 22.2R3-S2-EVO, from 22.3 before 22.3R2-S2-EVO, 22.3R3-S1-EVO, from 22.4 before 22.4R2-S2-EVO, 22.4R3-EVO, from 23.2 before 23.2R1-S1-EVO, 23.2R2-EVO.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-30380"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-755"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-04-16T20:15:09Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "An Improper Handling of Exceptional Conditions vulnerability in Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows an adjacent unauthenticated attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS), which causes the l2cpd process to crash by sending a specific TLV.\n\nThe l2cpd process is responsible for layer 2 control protocols, such as STP, RSTP, MSTP, VSTP, ERP, and LLDP.\u00a0 The impact of the l2cpd crash is reinitialization of STP protocols (RSTP, MSTP or VSTP), and MVRP and ERP, leading to a Denial of Service.\u00a0\u00a0Continued receipt and processing of this specific TLV will create a sustained Denial of Service (DoS) condition.\nThis issue affects:\n\nJunos OS: \nall versions before 20.4R3-S9, \nfrom 21.2 before 21.2R3-S7, \nfrom 21.3 before 21.3R3-S5, \nfrom 21.4 before 21.4R3-S4, \nfrom 22.1 before 22.1R3-S4, \nfrom 22.2 before 22.2R3-S2, \nfrom 22.3 before 22.3R2-S2, 22.3R3-S1, \nfrom 22.4 before 22.4R2-S2, 22.4R3, \nfrom 23.2 before 23.2R1-S1, 23.2R2;\n\nJunos OS Evolved: \nall versions before 21.2R3-S7,\n\n \nfrom 21.3 before 21.3R3-S5-EVO, \nfrom 21.4 before 21.4R3-S5-EVO, \nfrom 22.1 before 22.1R3-S4-EVO, \nfrom 22.2 before 22.2R3-S2-EVO, \nfrom 22.3 before 22.3R2-S2-EVO, 22.3R3-S1-EVO, \nfrom 22.4 before 22.4R2-S2-EVO, 22.4R3-EVO, \nfrom 23.2 before 23.2R1-S1-EVO, 23.2R2-EVO.\n\n",
  "id": "GHSA-x7p5-c683-6jrp",
  "modified": "2024-05-16T18:30:31Z",
  "published": "2024-04-16T21:31:28Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-30380"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://supportportal.juniper.net/JSA79171"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/4.0#CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.