GHSA-X93P-W2CH-FG67

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-12-10 18:20 – Updated: 2025-12-11 15:50
VLAI?
Summary
Ibexa User Bundle is missing password change validation
Details

Impact

The vulnerability is in the password change dialog in the back office. During the transition from v4 to v5 a mistake was made in the validation code which caused the validation of the previous password to not run as expected. This made it possible for a logged in user to change password in the back office without knowing the previous password. For example if someone logs in, leaves their workstation unlocked, and another person uses the same machine.

Credit

The issue was reported to us by Code-Rhapsodie. We thank them for their responsible disclosure! https://www.code-rhapsodie.fr/

Patches

  • See "Patched versions".
  • https://github.com/ibexa/user/commit/9d485bf385e6401c9f7ee80287d8ccd00f73dcf4

Workarounds

None.

Severity ?
9.3 (Critical)
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Packagist",
        "name": "ibexa/user"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "5.0.0-beta1"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "5.0.4"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-67719"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-620"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2025-12-10T18:20:55Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-12-11T02:16:18Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "### Impact\nThe vulnerability is in the password change dialog in the back office. During the transition from v4 to v5 a mistake was made in the validation code which caused the validation of the previous password to not run as expected. This made it possible for a logged in user to change password in the back office without knowing the previous password. For example if someone logs in, leaves their workstation unlocked, and another person uses the same machine.\n\n### Credit\nThe issue was reported to us by Code-Rhapsodie. We thank them for their responsible disclosure!\nhttps://www.code-rhapsodie.fr/\n\n### Patches\n- See \"Patched versions\".\n- https://github.com/ibexa/user/commit/9d485bf385e6401c9f7ee80287d8ccd00f73dcf4\n\n### Workarounds\nNone.",
  "id": "GHSA-x93p-w2ch-fg67",
  "modified": "2025-12-11T15:50:05Z",
  "published": "2025-12-10T18:20:55Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/ibexa/user/security/advisories/GHSA-x93p-w2ch-fg67"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-67719"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/ibexa/user/commit/9d485bf385e6401c9f7ee80287d8ccd00f73dcf4"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://developers.ibexa.co/security-advisories/ibexa-sa-2025-005-password-change-and-xss-vulnerabilities-in-back-office"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/ibexa/user"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Ibexa User Bundle is missing password change validation"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.