GHSA-X9P3-334F-M7G8
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-05 02:48 – Updated: 2025-04-12 12:34
VLAI?
Details
Isync 0.4 before 1.0.6, does not verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via an arbitrary valid certificate.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2013-0289"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2014-05-23T14:55:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Isync 0.4 before 1.0.6, does not verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject\u0027s Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via an arbitrary valid certificate.",
"id": "GHSA-x9p3-334f-m7g8",
"modified": "2025-04-12T12:34:03Z",
"published": "2022-05-05T02:48:44Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2013-0289"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/82232"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2013-March/099544.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2013-March/099547.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/55190"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-201310-02.xml"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://sourceforge.net/p/isync/isync/ci/914ede18664980925628a9ed2a73ad05f85aeedb"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://sourceforge.net/projects/isync/files/isync/1.0.6"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/02/20/9"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/57423"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…