GHSA-XCFQ-6R83-FVM6

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 23:42 – Updated: 2022-05-01 23:42
VLAI?
Details

Multiple buffer overflows in TIBCO Software Rendezvous before 8.1.0, as used in multiple TIBCO products, allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted message.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2008-1703"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-119"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2008-04-11T10:05:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Multiple buffer overflows in TIBCO Software Rendezvous before 8.1.0, as used in multiple TIBCO products, allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted message.",
  "id": "GHSA-xcfq-6r83-fvm6",
  "modified": "2022-05-01T23:42:38Z",
  "published": "2022-05-01T23:42:38Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-1703"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/41760"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/29774"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/44269"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/28717"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1019826"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.tibco.com/resources/mk/rendezvous_security_advisory_20080409.txt"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2008/1189/references"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2008/1190/references"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…