ghsa-xcpv-777v-f4v3
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-04-29 02:57
Modified
2022-04-29 02:57
Details
XDM in XFree86 opens a chooserFd TCP socket even when DisplayManager.requestPort is 0, which could allow remote attackers to connect to the port, in violation of the intended restrictions.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2004-0419" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2004-08-18T04:00:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "XDM in XFree86 opens a chooserFd TCP socket even when DisplayManager.requestPort is 0, which could allow remote attackers to connect to the port, in violation of the intended restrictions.", "id": "GHSA-xcpv-777v-f4v3", "modified": "2022-04-29T02:57:42Z", "published": "2022-04-29T02:57:42Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2004-0419" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=124900" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/16264" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A10161" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1376" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/12019" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1010306" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.ciac.org/ciac/bulletins/p-001.shtml" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-200407-05.xml" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.mandrakesecure.net/en/advisories/advisory.php?name=MDKSA-2004:073" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openbsd.org/errata.html#xdm" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2004-478.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/10423" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.