GHSA-XCQ6-XF9G-6GC6
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-11 21:31 – Updated: 2026-09-13 09:32In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
NFSD: Prevent client use-after-free during admin state revocation
A stateid holds only a bare pointer to its nfs4_client; a stateid reference does not pin it. The client survives only because __destroy_client() drains its stateids before free_client() runs.
nfsd4_revoke_states() drops nn->client_lock across revoke_one_stid(), which dereferences the client to revoke a stateid and read clp->cl_minorversion. A teardown racing the dropped lock can free the client first.
Pinning cl_rpc_users under client_lock blocks the DESTROY_CLIENTID and EXCHANGE_ID teardown, which refuses while cl_rpc_users is non-zero. force_expire_client() ignores it: once its wait for cl_rpc_users to reach zero has passed, a later pin goes unnoticed.
Under client_lock, skip a client whose cl_time is already zero -- force_expire_client() clears it there before waiting -- otherwise pin cl_rpc_users before dropping the lock. The walk then either sees the expiry and skips, or pins in time for that wait to cover the revoke.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-89660"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-09-11T20:19:52Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nNFSD: Prevent client use-after-free during admin state revocation\n\nA stateid holds only a bare pointer to its nfs4_client; a stateid\nreference does not pin it. The client survives only because\n__destroy_client() drains its stateids before free_client() runs.\n\nnfsd4_revoke_states() drops nn-\u003eclient_lock across revoke_one_stid(),\nwhich dereferences the client to revoke a stateid and read\nclp-\u003ecl_minorversion. A teardown racing the dropped lock can free\nthe client first.\n\nPinning cl_rpc_users under client_lock blocks the DESTROY_CLIENTID and\nEXCHANGE_ID teardown, which refuses while cl_rpc_users is non-zero.\nforce_expire_client() ignores it: once its wait for cl_rpc_users to\nreach zero has passed, a later pin goes unnoticed.\n\nUnder client_lock, skip a client whose cl_time is already zero --\nforce_expire_client() clears it there before waiting -- otherwise pin\ncl_rpc_users before dropping the lock. The walk then either sees the\nexpiry and skips, or pins in time for that wait to cover the revoke.",
"id": "GHSA-xcq6-xf9g-6gc6",
"modified": "2026-09-13T09:32:27Z",
"published": "2026-09-11T21:31:35Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-89660"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/549bd9868e9d77b07ea94870940d64342829c6ad"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bf1f948691523282cc4905bc6cd325e0c0b49e6a"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e270e5a0778e5bff852c8862ce9576ce70359393"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.