ghsa-xcq9-r62j-qxcv
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 01:24
Modified
2022-05-17 01:24
Details
Buffer overflow in the sysplant driver in Symantec Endpoint Protection (SEP) Client 11.x and 12.x before 12.1 RU4 MP1b, and Small Business Edition before SEP 12.1, allows local users to execute arbitrary code via a long argument to a 0x00222084 IOCTL call.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2014-3434" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-119" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2014-08-06T19:55:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "Buffer overflow in the sysplant driver in Symantec Endpoint Protection (SEP) Client 11.x and 12.x before 12.1 RU4 MP1b, and Small Business Edition before SEP 12.1, allows local users to execute arbitrary code via a long argument to a 0x00222084 IOCTL call.", "id": "GHSA-xcq9-r62j-qxcv", "modified": "2022-05-17T01:24:41Z", "published": "2022-05-17T01:24:41Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-3434" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/95062" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/127772/Symantec-Endpoint-Protection-11.x-12.x-Kernel-Pool-Overflow.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/58996" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/59697" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/34272" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/252068" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/109663" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/68946" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.symantec.com/security_response/securityupdates/detail.jsp?fid=security_advisory\u0026pvid=security_advisory\u0026year=\u0026suid=20140804_00" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.