GHSA-XF9V-H9F2-2PHH
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 03:29 – Updated: 2025-04-12 12:56
VLAI?
Details
The generate_dialback function in the mod_dialback module in Prosody before 0.9.10 does not properly separate fields when generating dialback keys, which allows remote attackers to spoof XMPP network domains via a crafted stream id and domain name that is included in the target domain as a suffix.
Severity ?
5.3 (Medium)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2016-0756"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-20"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2016-01-29T20:59:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The generate_dialback function in the mod_dialback module in Prosody before 0.9.10 does not properly separate fields when generating dialback keys, which allows remote attackers to spoof XMPP network domains via a crafted stream id and domain name that is included in the target domain as a suffix.",
"id": "GHSA-xf9v-h9f2-2phh",
"modified": "2025-04-12T12:56:31Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T03:29:31Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-0756"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://prosody.im/issues/issue/596"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://prosody.im/security/advisory_20160127"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://blog.prosody.im/prosody-0-9-10-released"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-February/176796.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-February/176914.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3463"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/01/27/10"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/82241"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…