ghsa-xfw2-qh29-p3mm
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-11-05 18:32
Modified
2024-11-08 21:33
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

xfrm: fix one more kernel-infoleak in algo dumping

During fuzz testing, the following issue was discovered:

BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in _copy_to_iter+0x598/0x2a30 _copy_to_iter+0x598/0x2a30 __skb_datagram_iter+0x168/0x1060 skb_copy_datagram_iter+0x5b/0x220 netlink_recvmsg+0x362/0x1700 sock_recvmsg+0x2dc/0x390 __sys_recvfrom+0x381/0x6d0 __x64_sys_recvfrom+0x130/0x200 x64_sys_call+0x32c8/0x3cc0 do_syscall_64+0xd8/0x1c0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x79/0x81

Uninit was stored to memory at: copy_to_user_state_extra+0xcc1/0x1e00 dump_one_state+0x28c/0x5f0 xfrm_state_walk+0x548/0x11e0 xfrm_dump_sa+0x1e0/0x840 netlink_dump+0x943/0x1c40 __netlink_dump_start+0x746/0xdb0 xfrm_user_rcv_msg+0x429/0xc00 netlink_rcv_skb+0x613/0x780 xfrm_netlink_rcv+0x77/0xc0 netlink_unicast+0xe90/0x1280 netlink_sendmsg+0x126d/0x1490 __sock_sendmsg+0x332/0x3d0 _syssendmsg+0x863/0xc30 _sys_sendmsg+0x285/0x3e0 __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x2d6/0x560 x64_sys_call+0x1316/0x3cc0 do_syscall_64+0xd8/0x1c0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x79/0x81

Uninit was created at: __kmalloc+0x571/0xd30 attach_auth+0x106/0x3e0 xfrm_add_sa+0x2aa0/0x4230 xfrm_user_rcv_msg+0x832/0xc00 netlink_rcv_skb+0x613/0x780 xfrm_netlink_rcv+0x77/0xc0 netlink_unicast+0xe90/0x1280 netlink_sendmsg+0x126d/0x1490 __sock_sendmsg+0x332/0x3d0 _syssendmsg+0x863/0xc30 _sys_sendmsg+0x285/0x3e0 __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x2d6/0x560 x64_sys_call+0x1316/0x3cc0 do_syscall_64+0xd8/0x1c0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x79/0x81

Bytes 328-379 of 732 are uninitialized Memory access of size 732 starts at ffff88800e18e000 Data copied to user address 00007ff30f48aff0

CPU: 2 PID: 18167 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 6.8.11 #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014

Fixes copying of xfrm algorithms where some random data of the structure fields can end up in userspace. Padding in structures may be filled with random (possibly sensitve) data and should never be given directly to user-space.

A similar issue was resolved in the commit 8222d5910dae ("xfrm: Zero padding when dumping algos and encap")

Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Syzkaller.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-50110"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-908"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-11-05T18:15:14Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nxfrm: fix one more kernel-infoleak in algo dumping\n\nDuring fuzz testing, the following issue was discovered:\n\nBUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in _copy_to_iter+0x598/0x2a30\n _copy_to_iter+0x598/0x2a30\n __skb_datagram_iter+0x168/0x1060\n skb_copy_datagram_iter+0x5b/0x220\n netlink_recvmsg+0x362/0x1700\n sock_recvmsg+0x2dc/0x390\n __sys_recvfrom+0x381/0x6d0\n __x64_sys_recvfrom+0x130/0x200\n x64_sys_call+0x32c8/0x3cc0\n do_syscall_64+0xd8/0x1c0\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x79/0x81\n\nUninit was stored to memory at:\n copy_to_user_state_extra+0xcc1/0x1e00\n dump_one_state+0x28c/0x5f0\n xfrm_state_walk+0x548/0x11e0\n xfrm_dump_sa+0x1e0/0x840\n netlink_dump+0x943/0x1c40\n __netlink_dump_start+0x746/0xdb0\n xfrm_user_rcv_msg+0x429/0xc00\n netlink_rcv_skb+0x613/0x780\n xfrm_netlink_rcv+0x77/0xc0\n netlink_unicast+0xe90/0x1280\n netlink_sendmsg+0x126d/0x1490\n __sock_sendmsg+0x332/0x3d0\n ____sys_sendmsg+0x863/0xc30\n ___sys_sendmsg+0x285/0x3e0\n __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x2d6/0x560\n x64_sys_call+0x1316/0x3cc0\n do_syscall_64+0xd8/0x1c0\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x79/0x81\n\nUninit was created at:\n __kmalloc+0x571/0xd30\n attach_auth+0x106/0x3e0\n xfrm_add_sa+0x2aa0/0x4230\n xfrm_user_rcv_msg+0x832/0xc00\n netlink_rcv_skb+0x613/0x780\n xfrm_netlink_rcv+0x77/0xc0\n netlink_unicast+0xe90/0x1280\n netlink_sendmsg+0x126d/0x1490\n __sock_sendmsg+0x332/0x3d0\n ____sys_sendmsg+0x863/0xc30\n ___sys_sendmsg+0x285/0x3e0\n __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x2d6/0x560\n x64_sys_call+0x1316/0x3cc0\n do_syscall_64+0xd8/0x1c0\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x79/0x81\n\nBytes 328-379 of 732 are uninitialized\nMemory access of size 732 starts at ffff88800e18e000\nData copied to user address 00007ff30f48aff0\n\nCPU: 2 PID: 18167 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 6.8.11 #1\nHardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014\n\nFixes copying of xfrm algorithms where some random\ndata of the structure fields can end up in userspace.\nPadding in structures may be filled with random (possibly sensitve)\ndata and should never be given directly to user-space.\n\nA similar issue was resolved in the commit\n8222d5910dae (\"xfrm: Zero padding when dumping algos and encap\")\n\nFound by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Syzkaller.",
  "id": "GHSA-xfw2-qh29-p3mm",
  "modified": "2024-11-08T21:33:53Z",
  "published": "2024-11-05T18:32:12Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50110"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1e8fbd2441cb2ea28d6825f2985bf7d84af060bb"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/610d4cea9b442b22b4820695fc3335e64849725e"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6889cd2a93e1e3606b3f6e958aa0924e836de4d2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c73bca72b84b453c8d26a5e7673b20adb294bf54"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/dc2ad8e8818e4bf1a93db78d81745b4877b32972"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.