Vulnerability-Lookup

GHSA-XG34-PXXF-5FRP

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-25 12:31 – Updated: 2026-09-25 12:31

Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

bpf: Mark the zero register precise for a register-form NULL check

check_cond_jmp_op() accepts "if rA rB" as a NULL check for a nullable pointer rA when rB is a scalar known to be zero, lifts PTR_MAYBE_NULL from rA in the corresponding branch and does not mark rB precise. Consider the following program:

r0 = bpf_get_prandom_u32(); r6 = 1; / the r6 == 0 path is explored first / if (r0 == 0) goto 1f; r6 = 0; 1: r0 = bpf_map_lookup_elem(map, &0); / absent, NULL at runtime / if (r0 == r6) goto 2f; / taken as a NULL check for r0 / (u8 )(r0 + 0); / verifier: map value; runtime: zero / 2: return 0;

The r6 == 0 path is explored first and the dereference is accepted. The r6 == 1 path is pruned at the checkpoint recorded for (1), so the comparison is never verified with a non-zero r6. At runtime a failed lookup returns NULL, NULL != 1 takes the non-NULL edge and the program dereferences a pointer that is zero.

Show details on source website

JSON

To clipboard

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-98040"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-09-25T11:17:32Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbpf: Mark the zero register precise for a register-form NULL check\n\ncheck_cond_jmp_op() accepts \"if rA \u003cop\u003e rB\" as a NULL check for a\nnullable pointer rA when rB is a scalar known to be zero,\nlifts PTR_MAYBE_NULL from rA in the corresponding branch and does not\nmark rB precise. Consider the following program:\n\n  r0 = bpf_get_prandom_u32();\n  r6 = 1;                  /* the r6 == 0 path is explored first */\n  if (r0 == 0) goto 1f;\n  r6 = 0;\n1:\n  r0 = bpf_map_lookup_elem(map, \u00260);  /* absent, NULL at runtime */\n  if (r0 == r6) goto 2f;   /* taken as a NULL check for r0       */\n  *(u8 *)(r0 + 0);         /* verifier: map value; runtime: zero */\n2:\n  return 0;\n\nThe r6 == 0 path is explored first and the dereference is accepted.\nThe r6 == 1 path is pruned at the checkpoint recorded for (1),\nso the comparison is never verified with a non-zero r6. At runtime a\nfailed lookup returns NULL, NULL != 1 takes the non-NULL edge and the\nprogram dereferences a pointer that is zero.",
  "id": "GHSA-xg34-pxxf-5frp",
  "modified": "2026-09-25T12:31:34Z",
  "published": "2026-09-25T12:31:34Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-98040"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6aed0134d3cda6382385a734ae0158eb7df6b142"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ddca9a3b8833168dda3e62676648a636fb3f221c"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

CVE-2026-98040 (GCVE-0-2026-98040)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-25 10:23 – Updated: 2026-09-25 10:23

Title

bpf: Mark the zero register precise for a register-form NULL check

Summary

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Mark the zero register precise for a register-form NULL check check_cond_jmp_op() accepts "if rA <op> rB" as a NULL check for a nullable pointer rA when rB is a scalar known to be zero, lifts PTR_MAYBE_NULL from rA in the corresponding branch and does not mark rB precise. Consider the following program: r0 = bpf_get_prandom_u32(); r6 = 1; /* the r6 == 0 path is explored first */ if (r0 == 0) goto 1f; r6 = 0; 1: r0 = bpf_map_lookup_elem(map, &0); /* absent, NULL at runtime */ if (r0 == r6) goto 2f; /* taken as a NULL check for r0 */ *(u8 *)(r0 + 0); /* verifier: map value; runtime: zero */ 2: return 0; The r6 == 0 path is explored first and the dereference is accepted. The r6 == 1 path is pruned at the checkpoint recorded for (1), so the comparison is never verified with a non-zero r6. At runtime a failed lookup returns NULL, NULL != 1 takes the non-NULL edge and the program dereferences a pointer that is zero.

Severity

No CVSS data available.

Assigner

Linux mitre root

References

2 references

URL	Tags
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ddca9a3b8833168dd…
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6aed0134d3cda6382…

Impacted products

2 products

Vendor	Product	Version
Linux	Linux	Affected: 2f4cb53eed448c1aeb6f4b40cf9c810716d8218c , < ddca9a3b8833168dda3e62676648a636fb3f221c (git) Affected: 2f4cb53eed448c1aeb6f4b40cf9c810716d8218c , < 6aed0134d3cda6382385a734ae0158eb7df6b142 (git)
Linux	Linux	Affected: 7.1 Unaffected: 0 , < 7.1 (semver) Unaffected: 7.2.7 , ≤ 7.2.* (semver) Unaffected: 7.3-rc2 , ≤ * (original_commit_for_fix)

Show details on NVD website

JSON

To clipboard

{
  "containers": {
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "Linux",
          "programFiles": [
            "kernel/bpf/verifier.c"
          ],
          "repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
          "vendor": "Linux",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "ddca9a3b8833168dda3e62676648a636fb3f221c",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "2f4cb53eed448c1aeb6f4b40cf9c810716d8218c",
              "versionType": "git"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "6aed0134d3cda6382385a734ae0158eb7df6b142",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "2f4cb53eed448c1aeb6f4b40cf9c810716d8218c",
              "versionType": "git"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "defaultStatus": "affected",
          "product": "Linux",
          "programFiles": [
            "kernel/bpf/verifier.c"
          ],
          "repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
          "vendor": "Linux",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "7.1"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "7.1",
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "7.2.*",
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "7.2.7",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "*",
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "7.3-rc2",
              "versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "cpeApplicability": [
        {
          "nodes": [
            {
              "cpeMatch": [
                {
                  "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                  "versionEndExcluding": "7.2.7",
                  "versionStartIncluding": "7.1",
                  "vulnerable": true
                },
                {
                  "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                  "versionEndExcluding": "7.3-rc2",
                  "versionStartIncluding": "7.1",
                  "vulnerable": true
                }
              ],
              "negate": false,
              "operator": "OR"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbpf: Mark the zero register precise for a register-form NULL check\n\ncheck_cond_jmp_op() accepts \"if rA \u003cop\u003e rB\" as a NULL check for a\nnullable pointer rA when rB is a scalar known to be zero,\nlifts PTR_MAYBE_NULL from rA in the corresponding branch and does not\nmark rB precise. Consider the following program:\n\n  r0 = bpf_get_prandom_u32();\n  r6 = 1;                  /* the r6 == 0 path is explored first */\n  if (r0 == 0) goto 1f;\n  r6 = 0;\n1:\n  r0 = bpf_map_lookup_elem(map, \u00260);  /* absent, NULL at runtime */\n  if (r0 == r6) goto 2f;   /* taken as a NULL check for r0       */\n  *(u8 *)(r0 + 0);         /* verifier: map value; runtime: zero */\n2:\n  return 0;\n\nThe r6 == 0 path is explored first and the dereference is accepted.\nThe r6 == 1 path is pruned at the checkpoint recorded for (1),\nso the comparison is never verified with a non-zero r6. At runtime a\nfailed lookup returns NULL, NULL != 1 takes the non-NULL edge and the\nprogram dereferences a pointer that is zero."
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-09-25T10:23:53.001Z",
        "orgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
        "shortName": "Linux"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ddca9a3b8833168dda3e62676648a636fb3f221c"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6aed0134d3cda6382385a734ae0158eb7df6b142"
        }
      ],
      "title": "bpf: Mark the zero register precise for a register-form NULL check",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "bippy-1.2.0"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
    "assignerShortName": "Linux",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-98040",
    "datePublished": "2026-09-25T10:23:53.001Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-09-25T10:19:56.071Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-09-25T10:23:53.001Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

Sightings

Author	Source	Type	Date	Other

Nomenclature

Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base model, served locally by ML-Gateway. They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.

Action not permitted

GHSA-XG34-PXXF-5FRP

CVE-2026-98040 (GCVE-0-2026-98040)

Tags

Sightings

Nomenclature

Related by attack behaviour