GHSA-XH6M-7CR7-XX66
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-02-27 21:54 – Updated: 2025-05-30 12:36
VLAI
Summary
Missing permission checks on Hazelcast client protocol
Details
Impact
In Hazelcast through 4.1.10, 4.2 through 4.2.8, 5.0 through 5.0.5, 5.1 through 5.1.7, 5.2 through 5.2.4, and 5.3 through 5.3.2, some client operations don't check permissions properly, allowing authenticated users to access data stored in the cluster.
Patches
Fix versions: 5.2.5, 5.3.5, 5.4.0-BETA-1
Workarounds
There is no known workaround.
Severity
7.6 (High)
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "com.hazelcast:hazelcast"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"last_affected": "4.1.10"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "com.hazelcast:hazelcast"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "4.2"
},
{
"last_affected": "4.2.8"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "com.hazelcast:hazelcast"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "5.0"
},
{
"last_affected": "5.0.5"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "com.hazelcast:hazelcast"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "5.1"
},
{
"last_affected": "5.1.7"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 5.2.4"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "com.hazelcast:hazelcast"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "5.2.0"
},
{
"fixed": "5.2.5"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "com.hazelcast:hazelcast"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "5.3.0"
},
{
"fixed": "5.3.5"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "com.hazelcast:hazelcast-all"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"last_affected": "4.1.10"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "com.hazelcast:hazelcast-all"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "4.2"
},
{
"last_affected": "4.2.8"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-45859"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-281",
"CWE-922"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2024-02-27T21:54:15Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2024-02-28T22:15:26Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "### Impact\nIn Hazelcast through 4.1.10, 4.2 through 4.2.8, 5.0 through 5.0.5, 5.1 through 5.1.7, 5.2 through 5.2.4, and 5.3 through 5.3.2, some client operations don\u0027t check permissions properly, allowing authenticated users to access data stored in the cluster.\n\n### Patches\nFix versions: 5.2.5, 5.3.5, 5.4.0-BETA-1\n\n### Workarounds\nThere is no known workaround.",
"id": "GHSA-xh6m-7cr7-xx66",
"modified": "2025-05-30T12:36:04Z",
"published": "2024-02-27T21:54:15Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/hazelcast/hazelcast/security/advisories/GHSA-xh6m-7cr7-xx66"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-45859"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/hazelcast/hazelcast/pull/25509"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/hazelcast/hazelcast"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Missing permission checks on Hazelcast client protocol"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…