GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-XH72-V6V9-MWHC

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-17 22:32 – Updated: 2026-05-12 13:35
VLAI
Summary
OpenClaw: Feishu webhook and card-action validation now fail closed
Details

Summary

Feishu webhook mode accepted missing encryptKey configuration as valid and blank card-action callback tokens as usable lifecycle tokens. Together, those fail-open paths could allow unauthenticated webhook or card-action traffic to reach command dispatch in affected deployments.

Impact

A deployment using Feishu webhook mode without a configured encryptKey, or handling malformed card-action callbacks with blank callback tokens, could fail open instead of rejecting the request. Severity remains critical because affected webhook deployments expose a network-triggered path into OpenClaw command handling without the expected Feishu signature or replay protection.

Affected versions

  • Affected: < 2026.4.15
  • Patched: 2026.4.15

Fix

OpenClaw 2026.4.15 makes Feishu webhook and card-action validation fail closed. Webhook mode now refuses to start without an encryptKey, missing signing configuration returns invalid instead of valid, invalid signatures return 401, and blank card-action callback tokens are rejected before dispatch.

Verified in v2026.4.15:

  • extensions/feishu/src/monitor.transport.ts returns invalid when encryptKey is missing, refuses webhook mode without encryptKey, and rejects invalid signatures before JSON handling.
  • extensions/feishu/src/card-action.ts rejects blank callback tokens in the card-action lifecycle guard.
  • extensions/feishu/src/monitor.webhook-security.test.ts covers missing-encryptKey startup and transport rejection.
  • extensions/feishu/src/monitor.card-action.lifecycle.test.ts covers malformed blank-token card actions being dropped before handler dispatch.

Fix commit included in v2026.4.15 and absent from v2026.4.14:

  • c8003f1b33ed2924be5f62131bd28742c5a41aae via PR #66707

Thanks to @dhyabi2 for reporting this issue.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "openclaw"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2026.4.15"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-44109"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-1188",
      "CWE-287",
      "CWE-294"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-04-17T22:32:47Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "## Summary\n\nFeishu webhook mode accepted missing `encryptKey` configuration as valid and blank card-action callback tokens as usable lifecycle tokens. Together, those fail-open paths could allow unauthenticated webhook or card-action traffic to reach command dispatch in affected deployments.\n\n## Impact\n\nA deployment using Feishu webhook mode without a configured `encryptKey`, or handling malformed card-action callbacks with blank callback tokens, could fail open instead of rejecting the request. Severity remains critical because affected webhook deployments expose a network-triggered path into OpenClaw command handling without the expected Feishu signature or replay protection.\n\n## Affected versions\n\n- Affected: `\u003c 2026.4.15`\n- Patched: `2026.4.15`\n\n## Fix\n\nOpenClaw `2026.4.15` makes Feishu webhook and card-action validation fail closed. Webhook mode now refuses to start without an `encryptKey`, missing signing configuration returns invalid instead of valid, invalid signatures return `401`, and blank card-action callback tokens are rejected before dispatch.\n\nVerified in `v2026.4.15`:\n\n- `extensions/feishu/src/monitor.transport.ts` returns invalid when `encryptKey` is missing, refuses webhook mode without `encryptKey`, and rejects invalid signatures before JSON handling.\n- `extensions/feishu/src/card-action.ts` rejects blank callback tokens in the card-action lifecycle guard.\n- `extensions/feishu/src/monitor.webhook-security.test.ts` covers missing-`encryptKey` startup and transport rejection.\n- `extensions/feishu/src/monitor.card-action.lifecycle.test.ts` covers malformed blank-token card actions being dropped before handler dispatch.\n\nFix commit included in `v2026.4.15` and absent from `v2026.4.14`:\n\n- `c8003f1b33ed2924be5f62131bd28742c5a41aae` via PR #66707\n\nThanks to @dhyabi2 for reporting this issue.",
  "id": "GHSA-xh72-v6v9-mwhc",
  "modified": "2026-05-12T13:35:35Z",
  "published": "2026-04-17T22:32:47Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-xh72-v6v9-mwhc"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-44109"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/pull/66707"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/commit/c8003f1b33ed2924be5f62131bd28742c5a41aae"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/openclaw-authentication-bypass-in-feishu-webhook-and-card-action-validation"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "OpenClaw: Feishu webhook and card-action validation now fail closed"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…